Open source and its benefits over proprietary software has always been a
subject of dispute among user groups, as well as within the IT vendor community.
Lack of awareness about the benefits of open source, lack of training, and
faster adoption of proprietary software has been some of the key reasons why
open source has been surrounded by speculations. But the situation is fast
changing with 2009 being a big year for the penguin-open source was embraced
with even higher intensity as proprietary software providers wholeheartedly
supported the open source model.
 |
| “The fact that open source
software provides better 'freedom from viruses' is a big pull factor”
Rahul De,
professor IIM Bangalore |
After the controversial Novell-Microsoft deal in 2006, Red Hat too signed a
major interoperability deal with Microsoft, launching an integrated product
offering in the virtualization space. What's more, in a move that surprised the
entire open source community, Microsoft contributed 20,000 lines of source code
to the Linux Kernel.
In the wake of these major developments in the world of free and open source
software (FOSS), a team from IIM Bangalore, led by Professor Rahul De, conducted
an intensive study on the benefits of open source implementations across the
country, laying all speculations to rest. The revelations of the report titled
'Economic Impact of Free and Open Source software-A Study in India' has been
compiled in the form of 20 case studies of Indian organizations drawn from
government departments, commercial firms, and educational institutions. The
findings of the report suggest that the FOSS engine is now well-fuelled to
propel the software economy of India.
Fussing on FOSS
According to Professor De, today the government, PSUs, education sector, and
SMEs are the biggest adopters of FOSS. He observed that the government has
showcased a huge interest in open source with some states such as Tamil Nadu,
Maharashtra, Kerala, and Delhi adopting FOSS as part of the state government's
IT infrastructure, e-governance initiatives and also the education system.
But there is still a lack of awareness among majority of the states that
needs to be eliminated through user training and allowing experimentation with
FOSS. He also points out that the government should make policy recommendations
mandating that RFPs include FOSS. “Within the government sector, the commodity
applications on desktops can be replaced with FOSS. Also the fact that open
source software provides better 'freedom from viruses' is a big pull factor,”
opined Professor De. Within the PSU space, the IIM team observed a massive
rollout on desktops.
|
Snapshot |
| Organization |
Number of Cases |
Number of Employees (range) |
IT Budget (range) |
| Government department |
4 |
800 – 40,000 |
|
| Large commercial firm (including
multi-nationals) |
9 |
150 – 120,000 |
Rs 400 milllion-100 billionn ($2 bn) |
| Small & medium enterprises |
5 |
20 – 120 |
Rs 1.0 million-5.5 million |
The study also points out that PSUs have better control over pirated software
by migrating to open source. As for the education sector, the innovation and the
ability to experiment, derived from FOSS, is very important for students. Also,
the freedom from lock-in and the freedom to make their own technology choices is
critical for educational institutes to scale up their infrastructure, design,
curriculum etc.
FOSS holds a lot of promise for SMEs too. While cost is a major driver in the
adoption of FOSS, the ability to innovate is also an intangible benefit that
they derive. The study revealed that SMEs have a faster learning curve to open
office tools. Moreover, as open source vendors are providing a high level of
support to SMEs on various FOSS solutions, there is a huge prospect of FOSS
adoption by this segment.
|
The Economic Impact |
| Projected retail PC sales in 2010 |
5.4 million units |
| 50% of projected retail PC
sales in 2010 |
2.7 million units |
| Savings per PC for replacement of Office Suite
with FOSS product |
Rs 16,500 per unit |
| Total savings for office
software at 50% projected sales of retail PCs in 2010 |
Rs 45,152 million |
| Projected total server sales
in 2010 |
138,000 units |
| Savings per server with usage
of FOSS products (a conservative estimate) |
Rs 10,000 per unit |
| Total savings based on
projected sales of servers in 2010 |
Rs 1,380 million |
| Projected enterprise PC sales
in 2010 |
4.6 million units |
| 50% of projected enterprise
PC sales in 2010 |
2.3 million units |
| Savings per PC for
replacement of operating system and Office Suite with FOSS products |
Rs 20,000 per unit |
| Total savings at 50%
projected sales of enterprise PCs in 2010 |
Rs 46,388 million |
Some of the benefits realized by the organizations that were part of the
study indicate the potential that open source software holds in drastically
bringing down the IT costs. The 'IT @ School' project of Kerala replaced Windows
software with FOSS on 50,000 desktops in schools across the state. Tangible
benefits amounted to Rs 490 million. A large e-commerce firm, adopted FOSS for
servers, MIS development, document management and for desktops. The savings from
desktops alone came to Rs 3 million. LIC, one of the largest insurers in India
with an IT infrastructure of 3,500 servers and 30,000 desktops, saved about Rs
420 million by adopting FOSS.
FOSS Payback
According to the study, the most important reason for adopting FOSS was to save
costs on the acquisition of IT. This factor was evident, with varying degrees of
importance, in 18 of the 20 organizations studied. “The economic impact of FOSS
was measured by three principal means-FOSS as a substitute for more expensive
desktop operating systems and office productivity applications; FOSS as a
substitute for more expensive server software; and FOSS enabled cost savings
from complementary products such as anti-virus software required on Windows
desktops,” said Professor De.
Other reasons for adopting FOSS include improved performance, security,
stability, etc. Some organizations running FOSS on core servers mentioned the
mission critical nature of applications for which they chose to migrate to FOSS.
On the other hand, many organizations selected FOSS for scaling up their
operations when needed. This is facilitated by the non-complex licensing and
distribution aspects of FOSS. Open source software has also attracted some
organizations owing to their security features. Many companies have mentioned
this as a major support to administration also. This is particularly attractive
to those adopting FOSS for desktop use.
Most companies also mentioned the freedom from vendor lock-in, and the
freedom to make technology choices, and thus be more democratic in the way an IT
infrastructure is built, as a major benefit of adopting open source software.
While cost remains the most important reason, other factors came on top of the
priority list for different types of organizations. Apart from this, there are
other intangible benefits of adopting FOSS.
The ability to innovate, tinker with, change and create new software remains
one of the most powerful benefits of FOSS. These translate to direct economic
benefits to organizations, however, the benefits are strategic in nature (and
not easy to quantify). It is estimated that the value of one Linux distribution
is about $10.8 billion. This is based on the development cost of distribution
that contains 200 million lines of software code. This immense cost is
reflective of the value that the ability to innovate creates.
For the 'IT @ School' case, FOSS enables creation of software for teaching
various science subjects and also for creating local language fonts. The free
access to source code and the ability to experiment with different platforms is
important for the education sector. Many schools in Kerala-almost 6,000 desktops
across 3,000 schools-have already migrated to FOSS and have already started
using and building specific applications for teaching purposes. They create
customized packages from existing FOSS tools for their special needs. In the IIC
case, FOSS products are used to enable students to experiment with software.
As FOSS products are not vendor driven, they enable users to make choices on
their own. The NIA experimented with FOSS-based emailing solutions, to
understand the migration process, the costs and cost-savings involved, and the
ability to scale. Success with FOSS prompted them to adopt more FOSS products.
IF Systems, an IT testing start-up based in Bengaluru, use FOSS-based tools to
bid for testing contracts as they can be acquired easily and skills can be built
up reasonably quickly.
The Road Ahead
Though the IIM study does not predict the size of the FOSS market, Gartner
believes that by 2010 it will account for 20 percent of the global software
market, displacing over $100 billion in revenues from traditional software
vendors. With Indian enterprises, government and even PSUs having adopted Linux
and OSS in a big way, the next wave of growth is slated to come from the SOHO
and desktop users. Open source software vendors are already partnering with OEMs
on pre-installed Linux OS to tap this segment. Also, localization efforts by
open source vendors, where it has been offering its products in multiple Indian
languages will further drive up the uptake of FOSS.
Priya Kekre
(Source: DQ)